Mon May 12 2008 2:22 AM
Email:   Password:     |  Register/Subscribe
Search Site:
Advanced
Search
  Archive

FREE Sample
PDF Edition
The News Leader
Newspaper Subscriptions
Home | Back

Railroad crossing safety at question after flashing lights are removed

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

Tnl4108nlrailroadcrossing-thumb

Photo By Edward L. Hale
A standard crossbuck sign is shown mounted to a four-by-four post in Amsterdam. Ohi-Rail Corporation has replaced deteriating lights at three crossings in the Amsterdam/Bergholz area with this sign.

By EDWARD L. HALE

Mr. Thrifty Correspondent

The Ohi-Rail Corporation, a Minerva-based railroad company, located at 700 Murray Ave., Minerva, had applied to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio on May 18, 2007, to eliminate flashing lights at three crossings in the Amsterdam, and Bergholz area.

PUCO approved the request on Nov. 20, 2007, due to limited train traffic and deterioration of signal lights that were currently installed. PUCO proposed the downgrades to begin with the installment of two crossbuck signs, one for each highway approach at each crossing, in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

The three railroad crossings were replaced with the "standard, old-fashioned crossbuck signs," shinny new signs mounted on four-by- four wooden posts.

The question and concern is why the signs were not replaced with the updated "Buckeye Crossbuck" signs that are reflective red and white. The Buckeye Crossbuck provides stronger visual signal among the measured crossbucks at night and during the daytime. However crossbucks do not provide the safety and strongest visual signal as lights and gates do. The mystery is why the crossings were not simply kept up in the first place or replaced the existing equipment with new, working lights and gates when one of these crossings is located on state Route 43, Amsterdam.

Vicky Moore, from the Angels on Track Foundation, said, "My only concern is that a crossbuck, no matter Buckeye or standard, is only a sign and signs don't protect you or warn you of an approaching train. This is particularly dangerous when you can't see down the tracks, because of sight obstructions and the crossing is not gated. What happened at these three crossings was a dangerous situation where the state took 'backward' steps going from active warning to a passive sign, a dangerous precedence."

"What is going to stop other railroads from doing the same? Local officials were too quick to approve this, without consideration of the impact on safety. It's possible the number of actual train movements were under-reported. The best protection is gates and no action should ever be taken to downgrade a crossing other than to completely close a crossing," Moore said.

An in-depth investigation into OHRC crossings found that crossings in both Carroll County and Jefferson County from Minerva to Amsterdam have the Buckeye Crossing signs, but not the three crossings where the deteriorating lights were removed. Also in the investigation, it was found that OHRC had a complaint filed against them last year from a Carrollton school bus driver, reporting obstructed grade crossings with trees and vegetation hindering the view at several of their crossings. OHRC has also derailed their locomotives several times as well.

The OHRC office in Steubenville was contacted and referred any questions to Powell Felix, general manager of Ohi-Rail Corp.

According to a phone conversation on March 28, Felix stated that "OHRC only operates trains a few times a year on the crossings and that the crossings do have flaggers to stop any and all vehicle traffic while the train crosses."

He went on to say that "the Buckeye Crossing signs are more noticeable; however, the crossing signs were replaced with the standard signs due to federal regulations and that the Buckeye signs are being phased out."

Felix believes there was no point in replacing the crossings with lights and gates since they are only used a few times per year.

Felix believes that instead of replacing the lights and gates at those three crossings, it would be more economical and sensible to place lights and gates at crossings that would have that have more train traffic than those in the Amsterdam/Bergholz area.




Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. Tnl-News.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.



Login above or Register to comment.

Terms of Service Copyright Alliance Publishing Co, LLC. 2007. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expresse written consent of the publisher.
Dix Communications